I chose a story from the New York Times. I liked it because, the beginning and the end felt like a feature story, but the middle felt more like a news story.
The article begins with several stories about men who suffered from heart attacks. It goes further to state, that friends and families of the men, believe it may be because they had recently lost their jobs. Then the author talks of studies about direct and indirect effects of stress. At the end of the article he brings it back to the plants closing and the statistics of people who worked there suffering from heart complications.
I liked the technique the author used. It was informative with data and statistical facts but it didn’t feel overwhelming or hard to read. I appreciated the fact that the writer included studies that were being conducted. It sort of validated conclusions made by the victims families and friends. He blended an appropriate amount of facts and descriptions that made it interesting for me to read.